We compared two USB-C to HDMI adapters: the Anker 310 USB-C to HDMI Adapter and the UGREEN USB-C to HDMI Adapter.
What we looked at
Resolution and refresh rate, build, compatibility, and price.
The verdict
If you want a well-reviewed 4K@60Hz adapter with an aluminium body and a braided-nylon cable, the Anker 310 is the pick at £10.99. If you would rather save £2.92 and get 2K@144Hz and 1080P@240Hz support, the UGREEN is the alternative, at £8.07.

A £10.99 4K@60Hz adapter with aluminium casing and braided cable.

A £8.07 4K@60Hz adapter that also supports 2K@144Hz and Dex.
Anker 310 USB-C to HDMI Adapter (4K@60Hz) — Best Seller
Intended for: Marketed as a plug-and-play USB-C to HDMI adapter delivering up to 4K@60Hz to any HDMI TV or display, with a lightweight aluminium casing for heat dissipation, a reinforced braided-nylon cable, and compatibility with Thunderbolt 3 ports. Carries 4.6 stars from 36.9K ratings on this listing.
What we liked
- 4K@60Hz with plug-and-play setup
- Aluminium casing and a reinforced braided-nylon cable
- Compatible with Thunderbolt 3 ports per the listing
- Large review history (36.9K ratings) and a 4.6 star rating
Worth knowing
- Costs £2.92 more than the UGREEN on these listings
- No high-refresh 2K@144Hz support stated
Best for
- Buyers who want a well-known brand
- Anyone who wants a tough braided cable
- Those who want a proven best-seller
Not ideal for
- Budget-conscious buyers
- Gamers who want 2K@144Hz or 1080P@240Hz
UGREEN USB-C to HDMI Adapter 4K@60Hz (Thunderbolt 5/4/3) — Best Value
Intended for: Marketed as a USB-C to HDMI adapter supporting 4K@60Hz with HDR, backward-compatible 2K@144Hz and 1080P@240Hz, Dolby audio, Samsung Dex support, and compatibility with USB-C DP Alt Mode and Thunderbolt 3, 4 and 5 ports. Carries 4.5 stars from 3.3K ratings on this listing.
What we liked
- Cheaper than the Anker on these listings, at £8.07
- 4K@60Hz with HDR per the listing
- Also supports 2K@144Hz and 1080P@240Hz
- Samsung Dex support
Worth knowing
- Far smaller review history than the Anker (3.3K vs 36.9K ratings)
- Slightly lower star rating than the Anker (4.5 vs 4.6)
Best for
- Buyers who want the lower price
- Anyone who wants high refresh rate options
- Those with a Galaxy phone who want Dex
Not ideal for
- Buyers who want the largest review history
- Anyone who prefers an aluminium-cased adapter



